tobold.org

correct • elegant • free

△ comp.mail.* △

◅ FAQ? Preventing e-mail forgery

Desperately needed: Some way to get MS Mail for Windows into SMTP net ▻

Internet vs. X.400

In article <292gq5$5pe@cs.pdx.edu>, Scott Peterson <scottp@cs.pdx.edu> wrote:
>Now that MIME exists, is there a single thing X.400 can do which SMTP/MIME
>can't?

You need to throw in PEM too.  (Although security features were only
introduced in the 1988 version of the protocol, and deployment of
X.400(88) seems almost non-existent.)

Tim.
--
Tim Goodwin | "I suspect that this lack of specificity is either insane or
PIPEX Ltd   | brilliant, but I could be wrong...." - Nathaniel Borenstein.

Original headers:

From: tim@pipex.net (Tim Goodwin)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Internet vs. X.400
Date: 8 Oct 1993 12:54:08 +0100
Organization: PIPEX Ltd, Cambridge, UK
Message-ID: <293kd0$6jp@tank.pipex.net>
References: <748784684.10snx@jacc.com> <749336174.5snx@andy.proxima.alt.za>
  <28j2mq$9vs@flode.nvg.unit.no> <292gq5$5pe@cs.pdx.edu>

△ comp.mail.* △

◅ FAQ? Preventing e-mail forgery

Desperately needed: Some way to get MS Mail for Windows into SMTP net ▻